Strike Security – See Us Now To Track Down Extra Info..

Tactical Support Service helps reduce expensive disruptions to your business that could result from a labor dispute. We have a proven track record of excellence in the market, gained during twenty five years of experience meeting the labor crisis security needs of over 2,000 clients in the usa and Canada. Special Response Corporation teams and/or TeamWorks USA, Inc personnel could be deployed to your location with round the clock notice or less. Our security professionals are workers of Special Response Corporation, on stand by status, awaiting deployment.

Our teams consist of professional, disciplined and strike security companies with extensive police force or military experience, trained to meet your security needs. Labor Dispute/Strike Security Services offered include:

We now have dealt with clients in such industries as: aggregate, utility, energy, paper, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, chemical, hospitality, grocery/retail, entertainment, media, healthcare, construction, pharmaceutical, waste haulers, telecommunications, defense contractors, and transportation.

Protecting one’s information from the threat of technical interception, or eavesdropping, is complicated by the variety of techniques, which an eavesdropper has at his disposal. If he is determined to intercept the information, he may employ any or all combinations of threat techniques. The amount of his determination will be influenced by the need for information (to him). The difficulties presented through the area in which the eavesdropper must operate will even influence the choice of threat techniques. Those things that limit the strategies at his disposal are the physical standards and safeguards in the target area, their own capabilities and his awesome use of specialists that can broaden his capabilities.

In evaluating the technical interception threat, several questions should be answered. Exactly what is the value of information to the potential eavesdropper? This value, which can be totally different looking at the value towards the owner from the information, tends to establish the threat level (the extent and expense that the eavesdropper goes to achieve the details). It also establishes, to some degree, the chance he is going to take to acquire the data. Obviously, if the details are of relatively low value, the eavesdropper will expend relatively little money and time and expose him/herself to hardly any risk.

Who constitutes the threat? This question is best answered by determining who can benefit from the interception. Based on who and what benefit could be determined, there exists some basis for an analysis of technical capability and probability that specialist will likely be employed.

What is the desired time period of the interception? If the duration is short, (a two hour conference for example) some interception techniques are definitely more convenient and apt to be used more than others. When the desired duration is surely an extended one (like continuous monitoring of an office), techniques requiring batteries inside the target area will probably be utilized.

Answering questions 1 through 3 could be relatively easy. The answer to question 4 normally requires expert evaluation in the specific problem area, when the evaluation is to be accomplished in-depth. However, consideration in the data based on the above mentioned questions will allow the non-specialist to help make at the very least general threat evaluations.

Put aside a room solely for the use of negotiating officials when discussing any part of the negotiations. Ideally, this room would be at the end of a corridor, above ground level or in a basement area. (Rooms or suites within a hotel can be adapted for this specific purpose.) Walls should be solid concrete block and extend from your true ceiling towards the floor. When the room has connecting doors, both rooms ought to be designated as secure areas and controlled accordingly. If rooms with solid walls can not be acquired, irgbmh for controlling adjoining rooms ought to be made.

Examine the room(s) before initial use to insure there are no security weaknesses (speakers, vents, false walls, etc of listening devices, which would compromise your position. An actual and electronic examination of the room(s) may be required on the recurring basis during negotiations. Secure the area ahead of the examination and maintain the protection posture through the entire time of negotiations. Another use of security disciplines should be put in effect through the use of: joint use security systems/security personnel, utilizing corporate personnel, off duty police officers or private security personnel. Insure that security personnel are not sympathetic for the opposing party. Alter the lock(s), utilizing outside locksmith services, if practical. Institute a mandatory key control and access codes.